10/12/2011
Ron Hellsterns Questionnaire to All Candidates
These
questions were written by Ron Hellstern, Corlyss Drinkard, and
Barbara Wilden
1. Commercial
development: Do you prefer restricting it to Highway 89
and/or Highway 165; or allowing small neighborhood shopping centers;
or maintaining Nibley primarily as a residential area? Please
explain:
2.
Communications: Please describe all methods you would
use to communicate with Nibley residents, including any that would
gather public opinion on proposed legislation BEFORE the council
votes on any issue:
3. Trails &
bike paths: Explain your opinion regarding trails and
bike paths throughout the city and, if in favor, how those can be
funded, where they might be located, and how to deal with private
property rights vs. public access.
4. Emergency
Preparedness: How would you establish/improve Nibley’s
ability to deal with disasters of any kind?
5. City
beautification: What are your plans to “improve” Nibley
City’s visible image? Should this be a function of city government?
6.
Representation: Should the Nibley City Council
membership be determined by electing representatives from within
Districts, or should the entire City vote for any legal candidate?
If you support Districting, should this be based upon geography or
population?
7. Ordinance
dilemmas: It has been mentioned that ordinances should
not be created if they are not going to be enforced. What are your
suggestions for reviewing, and possibly repealing,
ordinances not
currently being enforced? (Examples: weeds, snow removal, animal
land use, etc.)
Candidates' Responses To Questionnaire:
Kathryn Beus
1. Commercial Development: Nibley City currently
is zoned and able to sustain commercial development along the two
major highways that cross through our city, Hwys 165 and 89/91.
Revenue is needed to maintain our city and to implement future
plans. I feel that we could better utilize these areas and the
infrastructure already in place to help generate sales tax revenue.
Our largest source of revenue now is the money collected from sewer
fees, money that comes from our personal budgets. I see the
development of these areas as beneficial in two ways. 1. To help
supplement the revenue that is collected from the residents by
generating more money in sales tax and 2. Making Nibley an even more
appealing place to live by the added convenience of having closer
commercial relationships. As far as other locations for commercial
development, the Nibley City general plan, which was created some
years ago by a committee of Nibley residents, designates some
commercial development in residential areas. This would create “walkable
communities” with the idea of added convenience for the residents.
The current lay of Nibley City, I feel, makes these developments
unrealistic in my mind.
2. Communication:
If I am elected to Nibley City
Council my primary goal will be to be as accessible to the residents
as possible. The agenda for upcoming Council meetings is sent to the
council members a week before the scheduled meeting by the City
Manager to help the council members be better prepared for the
upcoming meeting. Ensuring that the Nibley City website is up to
date would help the residents know what the content of the meetings
would be as well as an email list that could distribute this
information beforehand. Those interested in being on this list could
sign up at the Nibley City offices and receive these updates. Also,
I remember when was younger my next door neighbor, Debbie Lowry, was
on the Council. She would talk to people on her walking routes and
get ideas and opinions along the way. This personal touch is
something that has impressed me many years later. Adding a face to a
person really helps deliver that feeling of community.
3. Trails: As an avid runner and a mother of a
young family that enjoys going on walks together, I feel that we
need to continue to develop trails and bike paths within Nibley.
According to our trails plan and our master plan Nibley City has
many unrealized trail plans. The proposed locations in these plans
and some current unfinished trails are along the Hyrum Slough,
within some of the developments of 250 West, around our parks such
as Gibbons Park and continuing along the Clear Creek subdivision.
These trails are enhancements to the communities. As more trails are
incorporated into our development plans they could be added by the
developers as they are building new homes and subdivisions. The
master plan already calls for such trails as part of the planned
cluster like communities and provides and pays for them by
clustering homes together and incorporating trails throughout the
new development.
4. Emergency Preparedness: Currently Nibley City
does not have an emergency plan in place in the event of a disaster
other than our flood plan. The quick response and the successful
mitigation of a potentially disastrous run off this past spring show
that it is effective. I would propose that the Council establish a
committee to evaluate proposals and adopt a plan to provide for our
residents in case of other emergencies.
5. City Beautification: No one can deny that
Nibley is a beautiful place to live. Part of this fact is the
natural aesthetic value of our positioning in the Valley and the
other contributing factor is the efforts that the City has put into
making it beautiful. Our median planting strips, parks, and other
projects have helped to set Nibley apart. I would like to see the
continuance of these programs. Through my involvement with the
Nibley City Tree Board I have been able to see what some of the city
goals are and I feel that they benefit everyone. Not only do our
property values go up because we live in such a well-thought-out
community, but we get the privilege of living in such a pleasing
place. The ideas that I support are having developers establish
trees in the park strip as part of the development of an area. The
trees would then all be the same size, type, and the uniformity
would result in an area that is recognized by its foliage as well as
dazzling springs with all the trees matching with their blossoms as
you enter a subdivision.
6. Representation: The current way that the
Council is elected as an at large election has made us question if
representation would be more equally disbursed throughout different neighborhoods if we were to divide into districts and then each
district would choose their council member. I feel it would be worth
entertaining for a few reasons. The first being a sense of
accountability. The residents within a certain district would have
their own member who would be held accountable individually within
his/her district for decisions made. Second, it would ensure that
each area within Nibley would be getting representation. I don’t
know if I understand the second part of this question as to whether
the districts should be divided geographically or by population.
According to Baker v Carr, the Supreme Court ruled that each
person would have to have the same “weight” for their vote. In
other words 1 person=1 vote. We would have to make sure that this
standard is upheld.
7. Ordinance Dilemmas: If Nibley City has too
many or unnecessary ordinances then I think the first step should be
reviewing our current ordinances as a council to decide the
unnecessary ones and then focus on their implementation. The Council
as a whole is the governing body of the city and those that are
responsible for the regulation of these ordinances need to be held
accountable for fulfilling their duties.
Top of page
Carry Cook
1. I would be more inclined to keep commercial on Highway 89/91
and SR165, Commercial parks. I know in our annexation plan for the
south portion of the city we have pocket style commercial, I
personally am not a fan of this. I think our city is small enough
that every one will have access to commercial by keeping it mainly
to the highways.
2. I am in favor of gaining input from our citizens prior to
proposed legislation. I would be willing to use any source of
communication from email, blogs and meetings.
3. I like our parks and trails plan. I love the idea of having a walkable community, giving all our citizens access to parks and
ideally the ones that are small enough that won't always have a game
going on so that the young families will benefit as well. Funding, I
look forward to having the opportunity to look into these area's.
Private land rights are important so I would have to look at each
situation.
4. Emergency preparedness, I agree we need to have something in
place. I would like to look at several idea's to be prepared. Map's,
safety locations, calling tree's, block captains, etc.
5. City beautification, my short answer is yes I think it is
important and there are a lot of idea's for that. It would be more
motivational than mandated.
6. Representation, I think that we are just know getting the
excitement of our diverse city by the numbers that are running. It
will be interesting to see if our citizens will show up at the poles
to see that they are represented. I tend to think that we are not
quite to distracting yet. But I am not opposed to looking at it.
7. I think it is beneficial to update our ordinances. I know that
our staff has been working on getting our books in order. What I
feel needs to happen is that we have a enforcement officer named
(most city's this is part of the city planner position) that would
handle all these issues.
In one of our P&Z meetings we were talking about the need to keep a
log ( or to do list) of all the things we discuss and need to work
on so that nothing gets lost in the work load. I think this is a
great idea. It would be a great reminder and also give us feed back
on what we are currently working on. I know that for example some of
us would like to see our fence ordinance revised.
Thank you so much for everyone's help and donation of there
time on this.
I would like to add that I am willing to take on a challenge
and show that I can work hard. I have a lot of great skills that I
feel will be an aid to our council. I am a problem solver, I like to
listen and work out the issues, I know that I can work well with
others and also communicate well with others. I know that if I am
giving the opportunity I can do what needs to be done for our
citizens and our city.
Thanks again Carrie Cook
Top of page
Joshua Frazier
1. Commercial
development: Do you prefer restricting it to Highway 89 and/or
Highway 165; or allowing small neighborhood shopping centers; or
maintaining Nibley primarily as a residential area? Please explain:
In regards to commercial development, I
will vote to uphold Nibley’s existing vision to “…encourage the
preservation of open space and the rural heritage of Cache Valley.”
Many current residents live here for
those very qualities. Preserving that, then, becomes an important
commitment to our citizens. Nibley can maintain its residential
community while still encouraging limited business growth. Highway
89 is an excellent place to allow for more tax revenue sources, such
as Petersen’s Country Store. I would be very
hesitant to allow small shopping centers if doing so would chip away
at the small town feel many people expect and cherish.
2.
Communications: Please describe all methods you would use to
communicate with Nibley residents, including any that would gather
public opinion on proposed legislation BEFORE the council votes on
any issue:
I like this question for two reasons:
-
There is a need for improving early
communication, rather than waiting until city council meetings
to both announce AND vote on issues. People need to know that
their voice is heard, AND that their opinion is used when city
council makes decisions. I have talked to many residents who say
that they no longer attend city council meetings because they
were never listened to when they did.
- I’ve already made some progress to
improve communication. For starts, I have made every effort to
make it easy for people to contact me, personally, on multiple
formats, such as:
Website:
www.nibleycitycouncil.com
(my personal website)
Email:
joshua@nibleycitycouncil.com
Cell phone:
1(801)390-5858
Facebook:
www.facebook.com/nibleycity
This one-on-one communication is good,
but it does not solve the larger picture. In contemplating a
solution, I proposed to the city to create a discussion forum on
their website. I also volunteered to create it. I was told that
such a thing may be a good tool, but would create too large a
liability for the city. Rather than relying on local government
to solve the problem, I created a solution. It is a neighborhood online discussion group
for the
residents of Nibley by the residents of Nibley. Located
at
www.nibleycitycouncil.com/openforum,
any citizen can read or reply to updates, post topics/concerns,
and subscribe to topics.
CLICK HERE TO SEE IT
This is brand new, but already has received a lot of local
input. I really think that this is going to be a valuable tool
for timely and quality communication.
In addition, I encourage the city to
announce the upcoming city council dates and topics in the yellow
utility bill mailers and on the city’s main website. I
can also create an email mailing list where people can easily
subscribe or unsubscribe to announcements. Currently Scott Larsen
maintains an email list and sends out announcements. I have
appreciated him doing that and would like to see those announcements
continue.
3. Trails &
bike paths: Explain your opinion regarding trails and bike
paths throughout the city and, if in favor, how those can be funded,
where they might be located, and how to deal with private property
rights vs. public access.
Trails /
bike paths: In
meeting with and talking with residents, I have heard many express
their desire for parks, particularly those with kids who are
involved in soccer, baseball and other sports. Parks add a nice
atmosphere to a community, invite local gatherings and provide
needed space and equipment for children to develop. I value parks
and generally support them. I would want to make sure that there
are adequate funds for building them, and that acquiring those funds
does not burden the community with unnecessary taxes.
http://www.aswn.com/clients/status/nibley/GE3.htm
shows the current and future parks as well as the Master Parks
Plan. It looks like a lot of work has gone into this, but I would
like to get more public feedback. Shawn Platt has mentioned the idea
of an equestrian park and I’m sure that there are additional good
ideas that we should tap into and discuss.
(This question is
already a thread on the Nibley Discussion Group –
Click here to see the topic )
Private
property rights vs. public:
We created government to protect the basic rights of life, liberty
and property. In the name of “Community Rights”, personal property
rights often get intruded upon. I’m not sure what the issues are on
public access to parks and trails, or how they intrude on private
property rights.
Sure, the
community benefits when public rights are given more weight, but
those benefits come at an expense to freedom and personal property
rights. To the level that trails and parks intrude upon private
property, parks may need to scale back or change. Certainly those
whose private property is going to be affected should be granted the
most weighted influence on the decision.
When faced
with a decision to regulate Nibley residents on an item, I plan to
err on the side of private property rights.
(This question
is also a thread on the Nibley Discussion Group –
Click here to see the topic )
4. Emergency
Preparedness: How would you establish/improve Nibley’s ability
to deal with disasters of any kind?
It is
difficult for me to answer this briefly, but I’ll try to limit my
response to some basics. We have seen, in recent years, what happens
when people rely too much on government or FEMA to respond to a
disaster. There are many examples that show the power of personal
preparedness solving not only individual needs, but community needs
as well. The more the people here can be self-reliant, the less
strain would be put on Nibley City. When individuals are already
accustomed to preparing for possible hardship, solving their own
problems, and helping look out for neighbors, they will naturally
use those abilities during a crisis.
I believe
Nibley will be better able to deal with disasters if it is debt free
and self reliant. I believe we can meet our own city needs without
taking on debt or turning to the national or federal programs; even
if they are cheaper or free, they come at a cost.
The use of
credit must be reserved for emergencies because it weakens the
ability to weather crises. Regarding government debt, George
Washington said: “…avoiding likewise the accumulation of debt, not
only by shunning occasions of expense, but by vigorous exertion in
time of peace to discharge the debts…”
5. City
beautification: What are your plans to “improve” Nibley City’s
visible image? Should this be a function of city government?
Yes, I believe this is a function of
city government. However, we should not go into debt to improve
visible image. I love it when small towns have a nice entrance to
the city, nicely maintained city areas for public use, and seasonal
events, decorations, etc… These things not only build community
spirit, but increase American pride as well.
6.
Representation: Should the Nibley City Council membership be
determined by electing representatives from within Districts, or
should the entire City vote for any legal candidate? If you support
Districting, should this be based upon geography or population?
I’m really not sure if this is a good
idea or not. I can see a good argument either way:
For:
Thomas Jefferson said: “The
way to have good safe government, is not to trust it all to one, but
to divide it among the many, distributing to everyone exactly the
functions he is competent to....It is by dividing and subdividing
these republics from the great national one down through all its
subordinations, until it ends in the administration of every
man’s farm by himself; by placing under everyone what his own
eye may superintend, that all will be done for the best.”
I think representation is important and if creating districts can
help to accomplish this then I’m all for it. However, I would first
like to spend some more time to see how it has turned out in other
cities. I do not yet have an opinion on if it should be based on
geography or population.
Against:
Abraham Lincoln said “A
house divided against itself cannot stand.”
It seems cities often deal with the issue of "North against South",
"East vs. West", "south
side of the tracks" or “Hollow road vs. not-Hollow road”.
I do not
personally feel that Nibley is so divided, but this is a concern that I
have heard people express several times. I feel that dividing the
city into districts would only encourage feelings of “them” vs.
“us”.
Anyone who currently wants to run for office should do so
based on their merits, not their address.
7. Ordinance
dilemmas: It has been mentioned that ordinances should not be
created if they are not going to be enforced. What are your
suggestions for reviewing, and possibly repealing ordinances not
currently being enforced? (Examples: weeds, snow removal, animal
land use, etc.)
If a
law is passed, then residents should be able to count on the city to
enforce it. This is especially true for the citizen who aids
enforcement by filing a complaint. With limited city employees and
salary funds, too many laws will clutter the books and burden the
city with enforcement. The least amount of laws the better. All
unnecessary or superfluous laws ought to be repealed, although this
is harder to do than to say. Better is to not vote in frivolous
laws in the first place. I plan to be very reluctant and
conservative on creating new ordinances.
George
Washington said: “Government
is not reason; it
is not eloquent; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant
and a fearful master.” Understanding this, we can be grateful for
government, but very cautious in how we employ it.
(This question is also a thread on the Nibley
Discussion Group –
Click here to see the topic )
Top of page
Larry Jacobsen
1. Commercial
development: Do you prefer restricting it to Highway 89 and/or
Highway 165; or allowing small neighborhood shopping centers; or
maintaining Nibley primarily as a residential area?
Please explain:
We have discussed in the past reasons that I
favor an appropriate level of economic development in Nibley to
balance our sales tax revenues relative to other Cache Valley cities
and to strengthen our property tax base. I believe Highway 89/91
and Highway 165 are appropriate corridors that will eventually
attract commercial activity, and I am happy to limit commercial
development to those areas. I support going a step further by
continuing to limit development along Highway 165 to Neighborhood
Commercial, a more restrictive and less intensive commercial zone.
2. Communications:
Please describe all methods you would use to communicate with Nibley
residents, including any that would gather public opinion on
proposed legislation BEFORE the council votes on any issue:
I support any form of communication between
residents and elected representatives that helps elected
representatives understand how those residents feel
about an upcoming topic. I especially favor communication that
helps elected representatives understand why residents
feel that way. To encourage a dialog that explores the why,
I believe communication should not be anonymous. To the point, here
are my thoughts on several specific types of communication.
I feel email exchanges are the best way
for a resident to initiate a conversation with an elected
representative. Personal visits and phone calls are
also great, and an excellent way to dig into the details of a given
topic. I am interested in reading residents’ opinions in on-line
forums, and I have a strong preference for forums where
participants use their real identities.
Of course, these methods of communication require
Nibley’s residents to be aware of upcoming activities of the
council, so let’s discuss ways to promote that awareness. I
certainly support our existing methods of notification;
specifically, agendas placed on the City website (nibleycity.com),
published in the Herald Journal, and posted in at least
three public places around town. To add to these methods, I
believe we should start emailing agendas to residents who
would like to be included in such a distribution. We could begin by
asking Scott Larsen and Corlyss Drinkard (both have extensive lists)
to contact their addressees and invite them to be on the city agenda
email notification.
When I chaired a committee to amend our Animal
Land-Use Ordinance a couple of summers ago, I found it very useful
to have the draft ordinance posted to our website prior to
our meetings. I feel we should do the same for all proposed
ordinances and resolutions of the City Council.
3. Trails & bike
paths: Explain your opinion regarding trails and bike paths
throughout the city and, if in favor, how those can be funded, where
they might be located, and how to deal with private property rights
vs. public access.
I support trails and bike paths in our community
to enable and promote a healthy lifestyle for our residents. I
believe that the proper time to establish those trails is during the
subdivision development process and that those trails should be
located according to the Trails Master Plan in our General Plan (nibleycity.com/PDF/maps.pdf).
During the past four years, we have been developing the trail system
in Nibley using this process, and bit by bit, I believe we are
getting there.
4. Emergency
Preparedness: How would you establish/improve Nibley’s ability
to deal with disasters of any kind?
One of the best ways to maintain and improve
Nibley’s disaster preparedness is to work with established
organizations that specialize in those activities. These
organizations include the Cache County Sheriff Department and the
Cache County Community Emergency Response Team (CERT). I appreciate
the disaster preparedness coordinated by local wards of the Church
of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, and I encourage members of
that faith to invite all residents of Nibley to be a part of those
preparations.
I will use this opportunity to thank the Nibley
City employees who anticipated and responded to the threat of
flooding on the Blacksmith Fork River last spring. Those
preparations ensured our resident’s safety and averted major
property damage within our city.
5. City
beautification: What are your plans to “improve” Nibley City’s
visible image? Should this be a function of city government?
The best way to keep Nibley looking good is by
designing, implementing, and maintaining public property with the
same passion and care that master gardeners have for their own
backyards. We have finished some great projects towards this goal,
such as the landscape medians on 800 W and 3200 S. In addition, we
are working on some projects that include making Nibley a Tree City
with the National Arbor Day Foundation. I thank the city employees
that maintain our city property with such passion. By creating this
“sense of place” with public property, it builds community
character. Residents who are proud members of our community
unsurprisingly take pride in, and care for, their own property.
6. Representation:
Should the Nibley City Council membership be determined by electing
representatives from within Districts, or should the entire City
vote for any legal candidate? If you support Districting, should
this be based upon geography or population?
I admit my current indecision on this question.
On one hand, I believe the democratic election process correctly
chooses the right batch of representatives – even if all five
council members live on the same block. In addition, I worry that
districting could fragment our community. One the other hand, the
possibility of unfair treatment of a specific part of town with no
council representation makes me think districting is appropriate.
At this point, I am undecided.
If we do move to districts, then I believe we
should draw geographic districts with roughly equal populations in
each district.
7. Ordinance dilemmas:
It has been mentioned that ordinances should not be created if they
are not going to be enforced. What are your suggestions for
reviewing, and possibly repealing,ordinances not currently being
enforced? (Examples: weeds, snow removal, animal land use, etc.)
Overall, I believe we have an appropriate set of
ordinances. Within the past couple of years, the Planning
Commission and City Council have reviewed and amended each of the
specific examples – weeds, snow removal, and animal land use –
mentioned in the question. There may be other parts of the
ordinance that need another look, and if so, then let’s do it.
Admittedly, there have been times when we have fallen short on
enforcement. This is not an easy task because no one, including
representatives of the city, enjoys policing their friends and
neighbors. In spite of that, we must do a better job of enforcement
in the future.
Top of page
Shawn Platt
1. Commercial development: Do you prefer
restricting it to Highway 89 and/or Highway 165; or allowing small
neighborhood shopping centers; or maintaining Nibley primarily as a
residential area?
Please explain:
1st
choice: Maintain Nibley as a residential “bedroom” community.
2nd choice:
Restricting commercial development to highway 89 / 165
3rd choice: I
don’t even want to consider allowing neighborhood shopping centers –
to me it would destroy the rural atmosphere that I moved here for.
We do have commercially zoned areas with a few
businesses in them. Commercial development needs to stay with in
those zones. We need to support the existing business and help them
to maintain and grow. We need to find ways to fill the existing
empty commercial developments because empty run down buildings are
an eye sore.
2. Communications: Please describe all
methods you would use to communicate with Nibley residents,
including any that would gather public opinion on proposed
legislation BEFORE the council votes on any issue:
Nibley needs to utilize modern technologies to
get the message out and to get people involved. I think the city
council can greatly increase citizen involvement by using web
broadcasts of their meetings. There are various free providers or
ones for minimal costs such as Skype and Goto meeting.com that could
webcast the meetings via a webcam or any camera built into a laptop.
I would bring my personal laptop with a webcam to all city council
meetings if the city does not have one that could be used. Think
about the possibilities! In times of bad weather, sick family
members or being sick yourself, those who are elderly or not able to
get out could log into and view and or participate in all the
council meetings. This would also allow any council member who
might not be able to physically attend council meetings to log in
and participate as well. At the minimum an audio broadcast should
be available to all via the web or phone conferencing.
These webcasts and or phone conferences could
also be stored for viewing or listening at anytime via the Nibley
City webpage or the Nibley City Council BlogSpot I set up (nibleycitycouncil.blogspot.com)
for up to a year as an example. All video and audio recordings
beyond one year could be stored at city hall indefinitely for
anybody to come and download. Currently the only medium for what
occurred in city council meetings is a scrubbed and edited version
posted days or weeks after the meetings.
We have television channels such as CSPAN that do
nothing but broadcast Congressional and Senate meetings. Why can’t a
simple webcast or at the minimum a free phone audio conference
should be available to all of Nibley’s residents?
To address the rest of the question, it is good
to see the email chain being utilized during this election process.
I think this is great way to get messages out – I hope it only
continues to grow. More and more people are getting their news via
electronic means and to only use the newspaper and flyers at
Maverick is highly ineffective.
3. Trails & bike paths: Explain your
opinion regarding trails and bike paths throughout the city and, if
in favor, how those can be funded, where they might be located, and
how to deal with private property rights vs. public access.
I am not in favor of a trail or bike path system
in Nibley.
We are so close to hundreds of miles of beautiful
trails and roads in the canyons and mountains surrounding us that we
need to take advantage of them.
The biggest issue I see is the rights of the
individual property owner. I respect the rights of the property
owner and if the property owner does not want a path / trail through
their land, then it should not happen – end of discussion! I know
there are ways to acquire right of way through private property and
do not agree with such pursuits. This is an issue Nibley does not
need to tackle.
There is also the big issue of funding to build
and maintain the trails. The funding for the trail system would be
substantial and I believe the funds would be better served
elsewhere.
I think it is great to have bicycle paths marked
along existing roads but that is as far as I would take it.
4. Emergency Preparedness: How would
you establish/improve Nibley’s ability to deal with disasters of any
kind?
This is a great question. What I offer here is
only my view and I definitely think there is much more to look into
on this issue.
Nibley by itself is limited in its scope to deal
with disasters as we are dependent on the county sheriffs department
and surrounding municipalities for other emergency services. The
basic objectives of response at the local level should be to save
lives; prevent an escalation of the emergency; relieve suffering by
fulfilling the basic needs for shelter, food, water and medical
care; protect property; and facilitate recovery from the emergency.
Nibley City has the prime responsibility as the local authority to
have a contingency plan to deal with any incident such as an
emergency or a disaster event. Nibley City should be constantly
involved in disaster management. Management of disasters cannot be
an add-on, chaotic set of actions during a disaster. Rather,
disaster management should be a clear plan or strategy with constant
training in disaster management.
Disaster management must be an essential part of
development plans and objectives. I wonder how much this was
considered when the decorative island medians were built along 3200
South and 800 West. How during an emergency or disaster situation
are emergency vehicles to get past vehicles along the sections of
road that have the decorative island medians? There is no room for
emergency vehicles to pass in those sections of the road which in
itself can create an additional disaster to compound the one being
responded to.
5. City beautification: What are your
plans to “improve” Nibley City’s visible image? Should this be a
function of city government?
I was not aware there was a problem with the
visual image of Nibley that needed improving on. I personally do not
have any plans to “improve” Nibleys visible image.
If the citizens of Nibley feel that Nibleys image
needs to be improved, then open forums seeking the input of as many
citizens of Nibley as possible should be held. Only after much
consideration and compromise should things proceed. The answer to
the second part of the question, I believe that the decision if this
should be a function of city government is up to the citizens. The
citizens decide if certain things they feel would add benefit to the
image of Nibley and can agree on what it should be and how to fund
it through due process. Working together with the local government
the community can develop a shared vision and agreed upon goals for
the visible image improvement of Nibley if so agreed upon.
6. Representation: Should the Nibley
City Council membership be determined by electing representatives
from within Districts, or should the entire City vote for any legal
candidate? If you support Districting, should this be based upon
geography or population?
I do not believe Nibley should divide into
districts for voting. I think any citizen in Nibley should be able
to vote their conscience regarding any candidate. I think
districting would create invisible barriers that would only serve to
divide and not unite the community.
What would happen should Nibley be districted and
no one want to run for office or only 1 candidate decided to run?
The purpose of having choices in the electoral process would be in
danger. We need only to look at the districting / re-districting
mess that is ongoing with our state to see that this would not be a
simple and pain free thing to do. I believe it would be to our
community’s detriment if districting should occur here in Nibley.
7. Ordinance dilemmas: It has been
mentioned that ordinances should not be created if they are not
going to be enforced. What are your suggestions for reviewing, and
possibly repealing? Ordinances not currently being enforced?
(Examples: weeds, snow removal, animal land use, etc.)
I believe in smaller government not bigger. I
feel we have way too many ordinances on the books for Nibley. I
think several special sessions of City Council need to be held to
review the existing ordinances and repeal the obvious unnecessary
ones and determine which ones should be done away with versus
maintained. This needs to be done only with community involvement.
The council and Mayor themselves should not be the only parties
involved in this process. Many open forums need to be held with as
much citizen involvement as possible. The ordinances to be reviewed
at each forum need to be posted on as many avenues as possible –
blogs, email, web pages, face book, webcasts, newspaper etc.
It is interesting to note that the recently
passed ordinance of dogs not being allowed to leave deposits in
parks and others property – was not a problem in the first place. It
was stated that Hyrum has a similar type law and someone mentioned
that it would be a good idea for Nibley to have one. Why I ask if
there was no problem? Why create more regulations and more
complications? The enforcement of said ordinance is a long process.
Someone has to complain to the city who can call the Sheriffs
department – or a citizen can call the Sheriffs department directly
- who then would have to determine the problem (fun job there!) and
if needed – issue a citation that then could be reviewed by a Judge
who could then issue a judgment or fine.
I feel this is an
example of unnecessary government growth when we should be shrinking
in nature and scope.
Top of page
Mike Smith
1. Commercial development: Do you prefer
restricting it to Highway 89 and/or Highway 165; or allowing small
neighborhood shopping centers; or maintaining Nibley primarily as a
residential area? Preferably to highway 89. Please explain:
I would like Nibley to stay a
sleepy bedroom community.
2. Communications: Please
describe all methods you would use to communicate with Nibley
residents, including any that would gather public opinion on
proposed legislation BEFORE the council votes on any issue:
Nibley City needs to have
better communication to citizen’s, i.e. email, newsletter, city
forum.
3. Trails & bike paths:
Explain your opinion regarding trails and bike paths throughout the
city and, if in favor, how those can be funded, where they might be
located, and how to deal with private property rights vs. public
access:
When I lived in Logan, my kids
and I would ride bikes to the river walk every day. Nice job on
Logan’s part. As far as walking trails here, that would involve
everyone the trail / path would impact. Their privacy would have to
be protected.
4. Emergency
Preparedness: How would you establish/improve Nibley’s ability
to deal with disasters of any kind?
Set up emergency evacuation
routes, gather places for head count, communication signs for every
home letting rescuers know if everyone is ok.
5. City beautification: What
are your plans to “improve” Nibley City’s visible image?
Should this be a function of city government?
Nibley city as a whole should
address this issue.
6. Representation:
Should the Nibley City Council membership be determined by electing
representatives from within Districts, or should the entire City
vote for any legal candidate? If you support Districting, should
this be based upon geography or population?
As Nibley grows this needs to
be strongly looked at, and if it is something the citizens of Nibley
wants, then it is what we do.
7. Ordinance dilemmas:
It has been mentioned that ordinances should not be created if they
are not going to be enforced. What are your suggestions for
reviewing, and possibly repealing,
ordinances not currently
being enforced? (Examples: weeds, snow removal, animal land use,
etc.)
I am a strong
believer, for not having laws to tell you to do something. If it
needs cutting, cut it; if it needs shoveling, shovel it; if it
doesn’t run, get rid of it; if you can’t take care of it, sell it.
I understand that there does need to be laws / ordinances, because
some people don’t / won’t do things. Maybe there should be an
Ordinance Enforcer.
Top of page |